Pingyin FIMITIC director of the village cadres corruption and collusion! A trial of impunity, prosec sayu-02

Pingyin FIMITIC director of the village cadres corruption and collusion! A trial of impunity, prosecutors protest as the CDPF Department staff, the welfare for the disabled, but the town of Dong’e Pingyin County CDPF former director Yan was combined with the village cadres to defraud 25 thousand yuan of special funds to support, a trial was sentenced to the crime of embezzlement from criminal punishment. The prosecution that the improper sentencing, filed a protest on the morning of 24, the case in Ji’nan intermediate people’s Court of second instance court. According to the prosecution allegations, 2013, Yan served as director of the town of Dong’e CDPF office, using his position, combined with the village cadres Liu defrauding 25 thousand yuan of special funds to support the disabled. Prosecutors said that the village cadres Liu is not disabled under the condition of two people for 3 disabled persons as is the person in charge of Liu of Rex rabbit farms, in order to cheat 25 thousand yuan of special funds to support. After being approved by the funds, in order to express gratitude, Liu gave Yan 5 thousand yuan. Yan said, in advance, she did not know that the application of special funds to support the issue of Ryu, including the application of materials and other procedures, are subordinate to handle, and it has nothing to do with. The other party in the case of Liu also appear in court, but the two man said to be quite different, he said, is Yan take the initiative to help it find 3 people with disabilities, people responsible for posing their own farms, in order to apply for special funds. The prosecution alleged, Yan there are many facts of the crime of corruption, bribes, corruption amounting to more than 30 thousand yuan. After the trial of the first instance court, that the amount of evidence is insufficient, the facts are unclear, can not be identified, and sentenced to Yan and Liu corruption, from criminal penalties. In the court debate stage, both sides focus of controversy is the special support funds belonging to the social relief, which directly affect the sentencing issues. Prosecutors believe that the sentence is too light, filed a protest that the amount of evidence Yan bribery is conclusive, the facts are clear, and according to the relevant laws and regulations, appropriated for disaster relief, rescue, flood prevention, care, and social relief for personal use, shall be given a heavier punishment. Yan’s lawyer said, 25 thousand yuan is the special funds to support, does not belong to "for disaster relief, rescue, flood prevention, care, and social relief, should be upheld. The case is not in court for sentencing.相关的主题文章: